(Summary)
Osaka Port management body will be decided soon. So, I investigated U.S. Port management system for 3 months. There are a variety of port management entities. Among them, the Port Authority system seems to be successful.
The reasons are
Osaka Port management body will be decided soon. So, I investigated U.S. Port management system for 3 months. There are a variety of port management entities. Among them, the Port Authority system seems to be successful.
The reasons are
(1) Ownership of facilities
(2) It has strong authority over peer headlines, inland waters, and land areas.
(3) It has the right to issue public bonds and does not carelessly create unprofitable peers.
(4) Committee members do not have political backgrounds
(5) The secretariat should be well-personneled.
・The port is not a free trade port in Japan under the condition of a foreign trade zone (according to the Cellar law).
・The structure and use of port facilities such as piers, sheds, etc.
Port facilities are large in scale, but many of them are structurally simple due to the lack of earthquakes.
The width of the wharf has become wider due to the progress of cargo carriers. Warehouse are two-story RC structures.
・All ports are struggling with railroad draws and roads.
・I felt that we should pay attention to urban planning behind the Port of Osaka, and that the area behind the port should not be a second- or third-rate residential area, but should be centered on Osaka's economy after watching U.S. Ports.
(2) Port services and port charges in the U.S.
To refer to the U.S. Pacific Coast Facility Charges (U.S. Department of the Army booklet) that we obtained, the concept of collection and fees are explained, especially for the port service part, as a reference for Japanese ports.
(2) It has strong authority over peer headlines, inland waters, and land areas.
(3) It has the right to issue public bonds and does not carelessly create unprofitable peers.
(4) Committee members do not have political backgrounds
(5) The secretariat should be well-personneled.
・The port is not a free trade port in Japan under the condition of a foreign trade zone (according to the Cellar law).
・The structure and use of port facilities such as piers, sheds, etc.
Port facilities are large in scale, but many of them are structurally simple due to the lack of earthquakes.
The width of the wharf has become wider due to the progress of cargo carriers. Warehouse are two-story RC structures.
・All ports are struggling with railroad draws and roads.
・I felt that we should pay attention to urban planning behind the Port of Osaka, and that the area behind the port should not be a second- or third-rate residential area, but should be centered on Osaka's economy after watching U.S. Ports.
(2) Port services and port charges in the U.S.
To refer to the U.S. Pacific Coast Facility Charges (U.S. Department of the Army booklet) that we obtained, the concept of collection and fees are explained, especially for the port service part, as a reference for Japanese ports.
アメリカ港湾の視察記 ＋アメリカに於けるﾎﾟｰﾄｻｰﾋﾞｽとﾎﾟｰﾄﾁｬｰｼﾞについて
1951年 徳岡堅三 大阪市理事港湾局技術課長
（要旨）
①大阪港の管理主体も近く決定される。今回3か月ｱﾒﾘｶの港湾を視察した概要について報告
・港湾管理 多様な港湾の管理主体ある。なかでも港庁制度は成功しているように見える
理由は ①施設を所有している
②ピヤーヘッドライン内水面、陸域に強力な権限を持つ
③公債発行権を有して採算の取れないピヤーは無闇につくらない
④委員は政治的背景を持たない
⑤事務局の内容が人的に充実してること
・外国貿易地帯（セラー法による）試験状態で日本でいう自由貿易港ではない
・桟橋、上屋等の港湾施設の構造及び利用
港湾施設は、規模が大きいが、地震がないため構造的には簡単な物多い
荷物運搬車の進歩で埠頭幅が幅広くなった。上屋はRCで2階建て。
・どの港も鉄道の引き込みと道路の関係で苦労している
・大阪港の背後の都市計画に注意すべき、２流３流の住宅地にするのではなく大阪経済中心にしていくべきと米国港湾背後地を見て感じた
②ｱﾒﾘｶにおけるポートサービスとポートチャージについて
入手した米国太平洋岸施設使用料（米国陸軍省 小冊子）について、日本の港の参考とするため特にポートサービスの部分について、徴収の考え方と料金を解説
No comments:
Post a Comment